Nowadays the problems that related to the organs transplantation, is one of the most complicated juridical and legal issues. By studying the bases of organs transplants, we realize that juridical and moral documents and their interaction sometimes could cause different More
Nowadays the problems that related to the organs transplantation, is one of the most complicated juridical and legal issues. By studying the bases of organs transplants, we realize that juridical and moral documents and their interaction sometimes could cause different and paradoxical theories. The pure juridical view of jurists creates three bases, known as "domination", "national property" and "legislative property". The permit of almost any kind of organs transplantation is the consequence of these three juridical theories. On the other side, the theory of "trusteeship" or "God's absolute ownership for organs of human body" is caused by moral approach on this topic. That does not permit any kind of Manipulation on organs of human body and introduce the human as a guardian and preserver of his body. This article is to study both of those approaches from the prospective of jurisprudence and morality and deducts that each one is related to other, and cannot be considered alone.
Manuscript profile
